Was the court's procedure ruling proper in denying LeBeau's equitable-tolling,due-process,civil-rights,habeas-corpus,standing,civil-procedure

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Apposite Authority: . . QUESTION ONE: WAS THE COURTS PROCEDURE RULING PROPER IN DENYING LEBEAU'S _.. EQUITABLE TOLLING? = Anthony v. Lewis, 236 F.3d 568, 574-75 (9th Cir.2000) ‘Cadet v. Fla Dep't of Corr; 853 F.3d 1216, 1221 (llth Cir.2013) : ~ Deroo v. United States, 709 F.3d 1242, 1246 (8th Cir.2013) Holland v. Florida, 560 U.S. 631, 645 (2000). Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276(1988) ‘ . Huizar v. Carey, 273 F.3d 1220, 1223 (9th Cir.2001) : Pace v. DiGuglielmo, 544 U.S. 408, 418 (2005) : Miles v. Prunty, 187 F.3d 1104, 1107(9th Cir.1999) : Lott v. Mueller, 304 F.3d 918, 922 (9th Cir.2002) : . Roberts v. Marshall, 627 F.3d 768, 770 n.1 (9th Cir.2010) . . Sossa v. Diaz, 729 F.3d 1225, 1229 (9th Cir.2005) . QUESTION TWO: WAS THE COURTS PROCEDURE RULING PROPER IN DI ING LEBEAU'S ; : EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES? ; Holland v. Florida, 560 U.S. 631, 649 (2010) : . Lott v. Mueller, 304 F.3d 918, 922 (9th Cir.2002) i Miles v. Prunty, 187 F.3d 1104, 1107 (9th Cir.1999) . Pace v. DiGuglielmo, 544 U.S. 408, 418 (2005) QUESTION THREE: WAS THE COURTS PROCEDURE RULING PROPER IN D! ING LEBEAU'S : , DUE DILIGENCE? . .. Allen v. Lewis, 255 F.3d 798, 799 (9th Cir.2001) : : Corjasso.v..Ayers, 278 F.3d 879 (9th Cir.2002) . : Holland v. Florida, 560 U.S. 631, 653 (2010) . Lott v, Mueller, 304 F.3d 918, $24-(9th Cir.2002) : : : . QUESTION FOUR: WAS THE COURTS PROCEDURE RULING PROPER IN D. ING LEBEAU'S ; CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY? ° Slack v. McDanial, 529 U.S. 473,. 483=84:(2000) : : Cox v. Norris, 133 F.3d 565, 569 (8th Cir.1997) ' Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 337 (2003) . . . : : Caldwell v. Lewis, 414 F.Appx 809, 814-15 (6th Cir.2011) Fa .