Whether the lower court erred in reversing the legal finding of fraud and misrepresentation by the petitioners

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED The Case Was nN 2o2zo I The Case ras istme& By Fraach and latwy eraniscende él @. 0. fiot The lower CourT rewercdkl of Leageak Fe ~2, a qy Fraed js Themems th Sens te els mss JY g @ Edwerd Sandier and Sjlvig lenaden2d hack neT paid peanp Evan Their peckad lnc YT meney From Cerringt perk Condo Hoh To fer By Fraad they ave not paid Bess Tham 26°65 | é fle They @ . @ How The Court reward Q),ce00 whe le Tey SS 4 mot. ped a penny Prem Theit pole @) on heeving The Lawy er aw Else wi'imess Ste, ted They po ied by T vcurence Pelicp LT request To présens Inte peice prolved anth Peq mef bY jusurmee bat They re Fuced (3) why They he ia Court heavine) . @ ys Judy e pebra Laese her amine Ry ely 2, G why a p peek Coer Tt uw y2 healed et JuoxT Givers vy £as Ay F ) VO Noe ler Kywet we have chein rewetion to Fave Tae Laneyer fore Mircond why Fleride tour? system is broKen' 2 ra a (Vo a !