Whether Jones' sentence and conviction were unconstitutionally imposed due to numerous constitutional violations by the district court

QUESTIONS PRESENTED WHETHER BY REASON OF THE NUMEROUS CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS COMMITTED BY THE DISTRICT COURT, SUCH AS FALSIFYING THE RECORD OF JONES’ TRIAL PROCEEDINGS, CONSTRUCTIVE ADMENDMENT OF THE INDICTMENT, DISQUALIFYING ALL OF JONES’ WITNESSES, CONSTRUCTIVE DENIAL OF COUNSEL, SENTENCING ERRORS IMPLICATING TEMPORARY LOSS OF JURISDICTION...ETC. JONES' SUBSEQUENT COLLATERAL ATTACKS ON HIS SENTENCE AND CONVICTION, WERE RENDERED FRUITLESS EXERCISES, BECAUSE THE DISTRICT COURT (8), 9TH AND 5TH CIRCUIT COURT(S) OF APPEAL, NO LESS THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, ADOPTED THE CERTIFIED, BUT FRAUDULENT STATEMENTS OF THE CASE AND FACTS, FOR WHICH ONLY THE SUPREME COURT CAN REMEDY THROUGH THE ISSUANCE OF THE EXTRAORDINARY WRIT OF PROHIBITION.