When Congress by Statute has mandatorily set where the criminal Subject Matter Jurisdiction of the offense must be, was the Fourth Circuit in error to disregard said Statute and confer criminal Subject-Matter Jurisdiction elsewhere in violation of 18-USC-3232, 18-USC-2266(7)(B), 18-USC-2261A(2), Art-III-2-cl-3, Sixth-Amendment

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED #1. When Congress by Statute has mandatorily set where the criminal Subject Matter Jurisdiction of the offense must be, was the Fourth Circuit in error to disregard said Statute and confer criminal Subject-Matter Jurisdiction elsewhere in violation of 18 USC’ §3232, 18 USC §2266(7)(B), 18 USC §2261A (2), Art. III §2, cl. 3 and the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States? #2. Did the United States Government as Plaintiff, per Art. III, have standing : in the Southern District Codrt“of West Virginia, when the actual gravamen per 18 USC §2266(7)(B) happened in the State of Texas where the government did have standing to afford a local district court Subject-Matter Jurisdict: ion? : #3. Since Subject-Matter Jurisdiction can be raised at anytime, was the Fourth Circuit in error to affirm the judgement of the district court on a felony : offense that did not occur within the trial courts territorial jurisdiction to give the said court venue for criminal subject-matter jurisdiction? #4. Does this courts:supervisory jurisdiction in fastidious regard for honor in the administration of justice in the Federal Courts require Supervision ; of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals to acknowledge that said trial court lacked constitutional competence for criminal Subject-Matter Jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 18 of the Fed.R.Crim.P.? II