Did the Texas Appellate Court(s) depart from judicial-proceedings to deprive petitioner's due-process rights

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Did the Texas Appellate Court(s) so far depart from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings by chosing to ignore its own rules and procedures which in the manners of its action is depriving, hindering, and impeding upon petitioner's Constitutionally protected Due Process rights to have, in accordance to them rules and procedures, a full, fair, and adequate proceeding(s) before the tribunal as to call for’ an exercise of this court's supervisory power? A. Was the petitioner deprived of his right to have an amended motion for new trial properly filed and presented to the courts; trial and appellate? B. Did the appellate court(s) enter judgments without first curing a fundamental error of procedural right? CG. Was the appellate court's decision to dismiss petitioner's notice of appeal from the July 13, 2022 ruling on the amended motion for new trial an etror/abuse of discretion? D. Does the district clerk's action have a bearing on petitioner's Due Process rights when a deputy clerk therefrom fails to transfer an electronically filed document, filed online by counsel, into the defendant's electronic or paper case file? II. Did the Texas Appellate Court(s) so far depart from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings as to deprive petitioner his right to raise ineffective assistance of counsel claim on direct appeal as to call for an exercise of this court's supervisory power? IIL. Is Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure uncostitutional in nature in the manner that the State forbids to raise sufficiency of evidence to the grounds of innocence on collateral review? Iv. Is Texas Penal Code § 22.01 (b)(2)(B) unconstitutional when . it charges an offender with an aggravated Class A misdemeanor once the relevant relationship is removed from the equation even though there is no Texas Penal Code that supports an offense as a Glass A misdeneanor arrgavated simple assault? ii. RK 4