Has Oregon's Judiciary and legislature failed to incorporate landmark cases relevant for how and when to enhance a sentence, and to comport with the rule of Federal law?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 22 02 cee UW Roe sey Rhee eS : Has Oregon’s Judiciary and legislature failed to incorporate landmark cases relevant for . _ how and-when to enhance a sentence, ‘and to comport with the rule of Federal law? Is a Unanimous verdict of 12’ votes and jury record a pre-condition and affirmance under ; : the Federal United States Constitution, before an appellate and State Supreme Court oe , , ”“déclares an’ Opiriion‘ahd dissént on Sixth Amendment Jury trial right sentencing errors«= harmless? . ° : , Ss rr . wn Ate Judicial discretionary findings Are merger and non-merger and concurrent and ; consecutive allowed to aggravate a-sentence to each count beyond the maximum set . by the statute under federallaw? ssi re . . . s . . : Does the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment provision of the United . States protect a defendant from having any of his Jury trial Convictions to be included _ and counted into his criminal history score and from being subject to a higher recidivist sentence to each count? we ee NG Foc Purpose. at the foregsing » on State Retion Liability» did the ; _ | Appeltate, Court correctly determmue the liability issees a Facts ? ~ "INTHE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES © : me PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI | oe A. OPENWTONS: BELOW~. Co . LL LTS Petitioner prays that a writ of certiorari issues to reviews the judgement below. YG For cases from the United States federal courts: . 7 ; coe The opinions of the United States Supreme Court of Appeals appear at Lo : ;