Whether the excommunication of an Honorable US War Veteran (and paying customer) by Fallen Federal Judges and unpatriotic Corporatistas for the evil Chinese Communist Party is a California Anti'SLAPP violation or Federal Treason?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The original questions were “Whether the excommunication of an Honorable US War Veteran (and paying customer) by Fallen Federal Judges and unpatriotic Corporatistas for the evil Chinese Communist Party is a California Anti‘SLAPP violation or Federal Treason? And how many thousands of Americans have to die from a CCP bioweapon pandemic developed in the Wuhan P4 Virology Center before Fallen Federal Judges acknowledge it as a ‘Topic of Public Issue/Interest’? And did such suppression aid . the CCP’s bioweapon pandemic further infesting and killings thousands of Americans?” Now, we have additional questions before the US Supreme Court, because the original questions were rejected in malice when Rule 40 (Veterans, , Seamen, and Military Cases) was violated when rejecting multiple “Motion For Leave To Proceed As An Honorable Us Veteran”. Additional questions arise like “Do we need Martial Law to enforce Rule 40 and elected real Patriotic ii Federal Judges via a bipartisan effort?’; “Why is the US Supreme Court hating on US War Veterans and hating on Rule 40?”; “Why have the Fallen Judges and Traitors not peacefully settle and simply accept the generous terms of surrender?” The additional questions can only be answered by US President Joseph Biden: and thus, the new questions are technically out of the scope of the US Supreme Court. Please note the US President Joseph Biden’s White House has been informed of the Pro Se Party’s requests for Martial Law. After raising the to $256BN due to the multiple “Rule 40” insults, docket mismanagement, many failed negotiations, and US Code violations, the Pro Se Party (the Honorable US War Veteran, and Honorable US Army Officer) presents the original questions via this petition to the corrupted US Supreme Court. What will the violators of Rule 40 have to say about the original questions? Will they have a mighty revelation, change of hearts, and finally apologize for over 2 years? LIST OF PROCEEDINGS US Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit 21-15234 Alejandro Evaristo Perez, Pro Se Appellant. LinkedIn Corporation, Appellee Date of Final Opinion: November 18, 2021 es California Northern District (CAND) Federal Court 5:20-cv-07238-EJD Alejandro Evaristo Perez, Pro Se Plaintiff v. LinkedIn Corporation, Defendant Date of Final Opinion: February 05, 2021 he Texas Southern District (TXSD) Federal Court 4:20-cv-02188 Alejandro Evaristo Perez, Pro Se Plaintiff v. LinkedIn Corporation, Defendant Date of Final Opinion: October 7, 2020