Whether the Eleventh Circuit lacked proper jurisdiction to rule on a case and allow that ruling to stand

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Ackicle 2. of the Linited States Constitution holds in gat that. “The. pivileag of the weit of habeas corpus shal\ nat be. suspendedssoa ‘No bill of abkamder ot ex posk facto Law shall be. passed’ Arhicle mr. halds in pack “The Tudicial power of the United States. shall be vested im one. Supreme Coutts. Ackiele. 1a nalds in pact that “Full faith and Credit shall be given in each ehate”. Aud. Ackicle. VIEW past halds, “This Constitubionye. acs shall be. the Supreme Law of the Land. and the. Sudges iM evety state shall be. bound thereby » cos The Question (s) 1 propose to this Honomble. Court is 2 i. Com the Eleventh Ciceuik docKer a case without propel jurisdiction, tule. on its without jucisdiction . and allow that cling, to Stand. a. When a (Pro sed fetitioner tequest a Full Aiscovety, ond all Tenceks moterial, befate . during. and after a trial ot any Proceeding and denied this tequest. Does Full faith extend to the denial a Peditionss's Substantial Rights .ptotected by YheConstitution. %. When establich Law holds a Prose. WA gant to a less steingent dandatda anc fraud requires spect ies. im which Sudges ate bound to administer the law as a Tarist, and a De novo teview bygasses Plain etter. . Does the bypassing, corcoborate with the denial of Due Placess. ishen “Conspitacy against eiqvts under \O S.C. O4lL is a Chime. Stated by 19 wS.C.8942.