No. 22-7296
Nathan Karl Thomas v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: constitutional-challenge criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing double-jeopardy due-process legal-review plea-bargaining sentencing statutory-interpretation substantive-review supreme-court-petition
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Sentencing Court give Petitioner a Substantively Reasonable Sentence?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED (7) Vid +he Government Preach Pettioners Plea Agreement Did the Sentencing Court give Rethoner Q Suostentively Sarensonoble Semtence ¢ : pid + alohon arise when Fettoner ble Jeopardy violernon arise” Bs oes of ree nies shat are “in law and ect dhe, Same offense!’ ¢
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-09-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-01
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-05-15
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
2023-04-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-02-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 15, 2023)
Attorneys
Nathan Thomas
Nathan Karl Thomas — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent