James D. Sullivan v. United States
HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Will this Court remand with a certificate of appealability in a case where a district court perverted the habeas-corpus-process, counsel-misconduct, federal-bench, miscarriage-of-justice, pro-se, standing
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Will this Court remand with a certificate of appealability in a case where a district court perverted the habeas corpus process by ignoring specific bona fides claims of misconduct by a favored attorney slated for appointment to the federal bench? 2. Will this Court provide Petitioner his last chance at obtaining a full and fair review of his prima facie habeas corpus claims, : uncontested by the Government, of: a) counsel's abandonment at a critical plea withdrawal hearing where he told his client "It's your motion. You argue it.” b) Petitioner being compelled to argue his motion pro se involuntarily without any waiver of counsel or a Faretta _ Warning. c) counsel's standing by silently as a judge ridiculed Petittioner's meritorious argument, and her refusal to acknowledge or comply with the-law, and then d) counsel's testifying against his client and calling him a liar. which represent just a sample of the unrefuted factual allegations presented in Petitioner's § 2255 motion showing de facto bad behavior of the court and the misfeasance of counsel, resulting in a miscarriage of justice that begs for a fair review.