Whether the trial court erred in excluding evidence of medical records and statements under the hearsay rule

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED OK lau Authartcatng Medical Pocords. (certified Copy ) Tn Quy “Short Cause” (Fraud) No Gunl.t presented The Ruthentiv (ert te Cast an oF Records into Evidence. Judge Roberta Hayashi di crn Oy ENderice~ Sulpock to Sechion \259-, Endence of a Statement is not made WModmissible wy MN \targay TAle ie the cha}ement Olas made for purpises Of tiga diggndsis oy treatment Cc cLuserilets rnedical Wustory oy past ov isi CyiMpToms, pan, oy sensations, or +, ind@prion oF gene OMaacor of Cause wy Stenal Sour@ qhergoh as reamnably pertinent to AIAG nogs o¢ Freatmunt. This Section cappliystd 4 ctayement made loy the Wie gin who 1S O WiOr ot Hat avKl of te ProCerdinge provi dad Wy Stoternunt was Mede who we vicki was under ce age of \ clegcnbing any ack, Oy attempted act,oF Clie Mouse o neglect child puse’’ Under The Sixth Amendmant: Ameya and my rt 7 rian to Trial toy Ju nth gern 4 rignt to Tia! ly Jury wos Evidence Code 59: Evidence of a Statemunr is tnadmissible Aus Statements and Physical Evidence of AouSL were disvegareled ia oth Roberta +100 ashi and Heather M. Man : AW stdted Ver Fotrey Ali ttaned Uguised the, \* de rer lourns and the sequal Aust. vt addition +p poling Ay iM hay oe and