No. 22-734
Rafael Gomez-Vargas v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General
Relisted (5)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: None
Latest Conference:
2024-04-12
(distributed 5 times)
Question presented not available.
Docket Entries
2024-05-17
Judgment Issued.
2024-04-15
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>Wilkinson</i> v. <i>Garland</i>, 601 U. S. ___ (2024).
2024-04-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-03-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/28/2024.
2023-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/29/2023.
2023-06-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/22/2023.
2023-06-09
Rescheduled.
2023-05-30
Reply of petitioner Rafael Gomez-Vargas filed. (Distributed)
2023-05-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/15/2023.
2023-05-15
Brief of respondent Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General filed.
2023-05-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 15, 2023.
2023-05-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 8, 2023 to May 15, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-03-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 8, 2023.
2023-03-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 7, 2023 to May 8, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-02-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 7, 2023.
2023-02-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 8, 2023 to April 7, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-02-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 8, 2023)
2022-12-21
Application (22A548) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until February 2, 2023.
2022-12-16
Application (22A548) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 3, 2023 to February 2, 2023, submitted to Justice Alito.
2022-12-16
Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filiing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.
Attorneys
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Rafael Gomez-Vargas
Jaime Ann Santos — Goodwin Procter LLP, Petitioner
Jaime Ann Santos — Goodwin Procter LLP, Petitioner