No. 22-7350
Emanuel Higuera v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process evidence evidentiary-hearing expert-testimony judicial-discretion law-enforcement preliminary-proceedings trial-procedure witness-qualification
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-05-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether district courts should be required to hold some type of preliminary proceedings before allowing experienced-based law enforcement experts to testify before the jury
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether district courts should be required to hold some type of preliminary proceedings before allowing experienced-based law enforcement experts to testify before the jury. i
Docket Entries
2023-05-22
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/18/2023.
2023-05-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2023-04-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 24, 2023)
Attorneys
Emanuel Higuera
Faryar Farmani — Farmani, A Professional Law Corporation, Petitioner
Faryar Farmani — Farmani, A Professional Law Corporation, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent