Is the Sixth Circuit's application of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)'s procedural bar to a collateral challenge to a prior juvenile adjudication that was used to enhance a sentence where the petitioner alleged the prior adjudication was procured in violation of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel, in violation of 28 U.S.C. § 2243's law and justice mandate?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. IS The U.S. Court of Appeals for The Sixth Circuit ("Sixth Circuit") Application of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)'s Procedural Bar To a Collateral Challenge To a Prior Juvenile Adjudication That Was Used To Enhance Sentence Where Petitioner Alleged That The Prior Juvenile Adjudication Was Procured In Violation Of The Sixth Amendment Right To Counsel, In Violate U.S.C. § 2243's Law And Justice Mandate? PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDCING 1. Petitioner Ronnie Dante Thomas The Petitioner Ronnie Dante Thomas (hereinafter "Petitioner") is State prisoner incarcerated since 2004 pursuant to the Judgment of Conviction and Sentence of the Seventeenth (17th) Judicial Circuit Court of the State of Michigan, County of (KENT).