When Article I, Section 9 of the North Carolina Constitution states that 'every person restrained of his liberty is entitled to a remedy to inquire into the lawfulness thereof, and to remove the restraint if unlawful, and that such remedy shall not be denied or delayed where habeas corpus would lie,' does the federal court need to have a special evidentiary hearing before the state court with the same issues?

No question identified. : Fedoval Quests | tha _utolation od due Protess Uudertne | traud Yh aviendment to hide awe_euidene batten be alate Prive to the suddes tevien — When Article | Section Al oF Ae Abeth Caroling Comstitutton States ever LevSon testrained of his \ihevdy is eutited 2 a remedy te dteibe Mata to awtulness_tnerecav aud tive wove tho teStramdif Urlowtel aud Wot comedt Shall tot bo domed on delaveds where Hubews Corpus Or all vot he, Str SPonde 4 then a Perse iS Mating Such ih QuthY 2 removal ih oitntarolihat a SPectal Fe dence Suet does the Fecins Sark! oF Such ouldense need to have. | ther hearth Betore the Las Sir) with tae —}Samie Sheets = Anita Enale= Leah bard = bhi Ta Ylo et AU Ditch Coucetlecie BAG ek t Makes Street CreenS baa Ae 1441 Kocran 40l Lubec Tohn S Luba kes be bondenty : 30U=45 i193 64 =35 J Liceul J3___ dd hietn toute Mp 23-/o9Q2 leant eo Andes Sita acta Mle loeb — tle or Content§ OPintens Below Stitutionat § Stu tutor’ Provisions evolved 32% teed ouk te lese , AtaSonS_for Crautin$ the wrib OY oncluSion ee Qe ~|Aptend st -ASid52 inputs to Appeals 3 DiStrick Cons a Append XB = OS trict Lhcket 2 te8