The USDC & USCA-9 denied Kulick's right to Due Process by NOT Addressing Clause '(5) Filing Of Magistrate -Judge's Report And Recommendations Before This Court Dismisses This case, For Any Reasons

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED i. . "1, ‘The USDC & USCA-9 denied Kulick's right to Due Peoceds by NOT Addressing Clauee “(5) Filing Of Magistrate -Judge's Report And Reommendations Before This Court Dismisses This case, For Any : Reasons"? ; ; ; . 2. The Contract Is-Iinvalid since Kulick did NOT have a attorney at Law under the Rule of Law of the U.S. Constitution To Advise Whether or NOT this Contract valid or nor? ; 3. Under the Rule of Law, the U.S. Consitution has been! violated by National Security shich sets it aside until that cu bd because ; National Security trumps when any part of this U.S. Eonstitution has been breached as to DUE Process & NOT having an httomey at Law . for "Advise". This renders NO trust, faith or confide ce in this . U.S. Constitution when its get this "trumps" as a result of National Security in the Prevailing, factual circumstance(s). that currently exist’ : _ “+t 4, Kulick is NOT equal to be mandated by any Rites of aby Court to be on the same level as an Attorney at Law, being in Pro Per stattus, that' NOT fair. The U.S. Constitution assures that anyone fhust be “equal" & treated to "fair", Which Kulick have been Denied bh uspc & UsCA-9 . by their determinations against Kulick? . 5. Opinion(s) decide one way or other what litiagte prevadls, hovever . those "“opinion(s) are WOT permanent—being. subject tof change. Which ; , whether or NOT exista, will or will NOT have somekindl of re-consideration in this case matter before this Court? | 6. See page 5, will this Court provide a federal decisibn that #ill protect seniors that join & live-in condominiums & other common-interest developments from corrapt Board of Dtrs. & their legal vehdors & their insur: ance reps., et al? . E 4 . 4 i Fee PATP | . | . trig. Kulick (Name) . CLERK ug FEED com H . 7 |} 38122 Village 38 (address) FER ih a8 | 3 Camarillo, CA 93012 (address) f \ ail 310-474-1848 Gees) FCA OR | i: cass ar i, él a i . 7 ; . ; _ . a : . | Es | UNETES STATES DISTRICT OGU at CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORM! ea | Bee’ , V103d SB-Sky, Ht | R.J. Kulick } Case Nez 4 = Sid | eee } (1) Unconstit itional gadici| ai 5 ary Autho#ity Over The = | | oe ¢-. Rights Of ja Citizenp -po) 43 vs. 3 (2) violation for americans | | 44 1]U-SBankruptcy Court, Central } With Disabilities act of = 41998; cota . is Wpistrice ef CA-Northern Div{ (3) Filing of Magistrate : Tao ca Tadga's R rt & Recommej i6| ion, Chapter 13, Howard Ie. 3. ndations Hefore This Court) ~ _ iF — Jeff F. Tchakarov, } Bay Ressorsy 2Se For . i : 3 ? ’ 2 -. | 18} Michelman & Robinson, LLC: } is eyaetine re geter and _ . aa & Does 7-100, Inclusive. +} No jury Prialf ---° 7 Poe & Boes 1-100, Inclusive. } = Defendant {s) } ; pe 22 4 I. Jurisdiction as 2A 1. This Court has jutisdiction under 28 U.S.q. Section =~ ~f 25 [| 1331 (federal question) & all other applicable Rights of a : _ 26 | Citizan under U.S. Consitytion & BLL of Rights| & Beclaration i : 27 of Independence parent of U.S. ‘Consitution & al other Se i : | 22 1 applicable federal sttntues. ° pote : i E 7 i HH = : a . i £ 2: . ’ i Res RIN. Page i , “UNEZED STATES COURT. OF APPEALS . Form 27. Motion far [Opposition To Order filed 1-25-23 As Uncon-! . i. = On Pisce tmina ton RIAs Bid vo : instructions for this farm: Blip-//vune.coP uscouris sovifarse pane erections Uk 9th Cir. Case Number(s}; 22-55750 _| } | Case Name |R.J.Kulick v. U.S. BKCY Court, Central] Dist. of cA, / . : Ro Te Div=is-e ai. . Lower Court er Agency Case Number | What is yourname?| R.J. Kulick in Pro Pro Per | : l. Wkatdo veu want the courttio do? =“ i Now,request a Petition For Rehearing En Banc.| Based on ; : Motion for Panel Rehearing dated 10-25-22,seelitem #s 1&2. : | This Court to STOP its denying Kulick's right& to Due Pro-: ; & to STOP =iso all Offfcers of any i : court at ALL levels in foregoing tco. Judges #UST Have NO : i Goubt_in their good conscience hefore renderihg a-rulingiit 2. Why should the court de this? Be specific. Incinde all relevadt facts and ia that