Whether the lower court erred in its application of the legal standards for evaluating a petition for writ of certiorari

No question identified. : Cf LIMON AY IOUS Ley TO APS ILLS BSAS Ye EMA WRK sa ey PATOU SSO TAN IS BT EIT SA OSY TRE LLUS TITY HITS LY AIT FALE POMEL och UFTIS FO yp BU AM PS Lite eeSNe SrepTnZ gyre IS PISWT) CPLetenNag ~ PHS SLE SY PHL PAVE IA. oO LEA Ng 2F avers sen og IWS) FOFTIW 24 SF PLLS HZ LY VIAKIT A F394 AIVI YO FEY SO INIT Tm] peop gate OL TINSOVEIIW I NIV Je ETL MOSM ENIMISEIL ME KOISITS Seer ONIN IWS ILIY ME {PEE AIS Tee PE BPUCL ANT AWE aE Le Mg Lo IFOVIY Pee Fe TIMeEy Teen usNey 5ere FECT PS Sey yey UND ayers ne VELTIITSY Y PHL LON oH | JOSS QIN wy BYMY ONstey vey ery teg LAPIN EEA TIEN LS HLL . IMINO LOE YO PLY MOY POE 9 LtES DIE Len IVI 6 AOPISAR MY WHat use aymWap| Uy C220 WYygy KITA » PSIG SS AUIS AID LL LOY TIN f IM yO PRO FY IMG oH OST I CRSNBGIS Ff hI BIND LTE eerie spoINA TILCLYLS PHL LO FyaM SS DEY A TUITION Y Ue ame wRLyag : FIOM ND TISIC7 7 ae STII BOO DML 298M ya £ CBVOLEIS ME gas TIKQ TINO LNEE ONL LON ay 6 G3LNASaud (S)NOlLSanD