Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the First Amendment's 'ministerial exception' should be understood as an immunity from judicial interference in church employment decisions falling within the exception, or instead as a mere defense against liability
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether the First Amendment’s “ministerial exception” should be understood as an immunity from judicial interference in church employment decisions falling within the exception, or instead as a mere defense against liability. This overarching question controls the answer to three sub-questions: A. Whether the ministerial exception protects churches against merits discovery and trial; B. Whether ministerial status is a legal question for the court or a fact question for the jury; and C. Whether denial of a dispositive motion to invoke the ministerial exception is appealable on an interlocutory basis. II. Whether the ministerial exception applies here to bar employment discrimination claims by a school chaplain who led chapel services, taught in the Bible department, and provided spiritual guidance and counseling to students.
2023-06-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/8/2023.
2023-05-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/1/2023.
2023-05-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/25/2023.
2023-05-01
Reply of petitioner Faith Bible Chapel International filed.
2023-04-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
2023-04-10
Brief of respondent Gregory Tucker in opposition filed.
2023-03-10
Brief amici curiae of Ethics and Public Policy Center, et al. filed.
2023-03-10
Brief amici curiae of Oklahoma, et al. filed.
2023-03-10
Brief amici curiae of Jewish Coalition for Religious Liberty, et al. filed.
2023-03-10
Brief amici curiae of Former EEOC General Counsel and Religious Nondiscrimination Expert filed.
2023-03-10
Brief amici curiae of The Council for Christian Colleges & Universities, et al. filed.
2023-03-10
Brief amici curiae of Association of Christian Schools International, et al. filed.
2023-03-10
Brief amici curiae of Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod, et al. filed.
2023-03-10
Brief amici curiae of Law & Religion Scholars filed.
2023-03-10
Brief amici curiae of Billy Graham Evangelistic Association, et al. filed.
2023-03-10
Brief amicus curiae of Notre Dame Law School Religious Liberty Clinic filed.
2023-03-10
Brief amici curiae of Religious Liberty Professors Mark Chopko, et al. filed.
2023-03-10
Brief amici curiae of Brigham Young University, et al. filed.
2023-02-15
Supplemental brief of petitioner Faith Bible Chapel International filed.
2023-02-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 10, 2023.
2023-02-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 10, 2023 to April 10, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-02-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 10, 2023)
Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod, Roman Catholic Archdiocese of New York, Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention, Assembly of Canonical Orthodox Bishops of the USA, General Council of the Assemblies of God (USA), Internat
The Council for Christian Colleges & Universities, The Association of Catholic Colleges and Universities, The Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America, The International Alliance for Christian Education