Whether the Ninth Circuit Court abused its discretion

QUESTIONS PRESENTED . 1. WHETHER, the Ninth Circuit Court “Abused in its Discretion with its . Findings, Recommendations and Judgment/Orders concerning this Case at ° hand? 2. WHETHER, the Ninth Cirenit Court “Abused in its Discretion in failing to examine Petitioners’ Due Process Issues, and make a Ruling on the Due Process issues in the case at hand? ; ; 3. WHETHER, the Ninth Circuit Court “Abused in its Discretion with Findings, . : Recommendations and Judgment/Orders concerning the Prior “Related _ Cases? 4 | 7 : 4. WHETHER, the Ninth Circuit Court “Abused in its Discretion in failing to examine Petitioners’ Due Process Issues, and make a Ruling on the Due Process issues in the Prior “Related Cases”? . 5. WHETHER, the Ninth Circuit Court “Abused in its Discretion in failing to | examine Petitioners’ Systemic Racism Issues in the case at hand? 6. WHETHER, the Ninth Circuit Court “Abused in its Discretion in failing to examine Petitioners’ “Systemic Racism” Issues in the Prior “Related Cases? ; 2 + 7. WHETHER, the Ninth Circuit Court Abused its Discretion in finding that Petitioners did not present a case that had "Subject Matter Jurisdiction” in _ The Case at Hand? : 8. WHETHER, the Ninth Circuit Court Abused its Discretion in finding not ; recognizing that Petitioners Cases (Prior Related and Case at Hand were and are under the Constitutional Questions/Issues before the Federal Court and not Family a Law Resolutions? : 9. WHETHER, the issuing of an “Order” that requires a United States Citizen to refrain from [videotaping in public places] application of his/her Constitutional Right [under the First Amendment] that is Guaranteed to Petitioners is a __ Violation of Petitioners Constitutional Right [under the First Amendment]? | 10. WHETHER, “Judicial Immunity” is rightly applicable to a Judicial Officer who make an Order that when applied, it restricts a citizen from enjoyment of a Constitutional exercise, that right is properly prohibited by the =e Judicial Officer? ; 41. WHETHER, the Eastern District Court Abused its Discretion by denying Petitioners Defaults rulings when Respondents failed to Answer Complaints after having been properly served with Summons and Complaint? . | 3 42. WHETHER, the Eastern District Court Abused its Discretion by denying Petitioners Ex Parte Hearings when a need to protect a child in the case at hand?