No. 22-7426

George Donald Hatt, Jr. v. Washington

Lower Court: Washington
Docketed: 2023-05-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: criminal-procedure effective-assistance-of-counsel informed-consent informed-decision mandatory-minimums offender-score plea-bargain plea-negotiations trial-strategy
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does effective assistance of counsel in a plea bargain context requires that counsel actually and substantially assist a client in deciding whether to plead guilty, enter negotiations, or go to trial

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Does effective assistance of counsel in a plea bargain context requires that counsel actually and substantially assist a client in deciding whether to plead guilty, enter negotiations, or go to trial. Further, does counsel’s representation include knowledge of mandatory minimums for the crime charged, offender score, communication of actual offers, discussing tentative plea negotiations, and the strength and weaknesses of a case so that the defendant knows what to expect and can make an informed decision whether or not to plead guilty, enter negotiations, or go to trial. 2

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-04-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 31, 2023)

Attorneys

George Donald Hatt
George Donald Hatt Jr. — Petitioner
George Donald Hatt Jr. — Petitioner