Did the Fifth Circuit err in denying plaintiff's appeal for compelling him to pay the bill of costs

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1) DID THE FIFTH CIRCUIT ERR IN DENYING PLAINTIFF’S APPEAL FOR COMPELLING HIM TO PAY THE BILL OF COSTS THE FIFTH CIRCUIT FOUND THAT PLAINTIFF WAS IN DEED RESPONSIBLE FOR THE BILL OF COSTS DUE TO HIS ALLEGED FAILURE TO DEMONSTRATE HIS LIMITED FINANCIAL RESOURCES AND THAT THIS CASE DID NOT PRESENT A SUBSTANTIAL BENEFIT TO THE PUBLIC. DOES ORDERING AND COMPELLING PLAINTIFF’S SUCH AS THIS ONE TO PAY FOR BILL OF COSTS, DETER FUTURE INMATES FROM SEEKING RELIEF FROM THE COURTS, WHEN THEIR CIVIL RIGHTS ARE BEING VIOLATED, RELATING TO THEIR MEDICAL HEALTH STATUS AND NEEDS. 2) DID THE FIFTH CIRCUIT ERR IN DENYING PLAINTIFF’S APPEAL FOR BEING DENIED MEDICAL CARE WHILE IN THE SPECIAL HOUSING UNIT. THE FIFTH CIRCUIT FOUND THAT DUE TO PLAINTIFF FAILING TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE TRANSCRIPT THEY WERE UNABLE TO REVIEW WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT COMMITTED CLEAR ERROR IN ITS FACTUAL FINDINGS, |