Did the California Court act in Obstruction of the Federal Individuals Disabilities Act (IDEA) Jurisdiction and Protections?

No question identified. : Did the California Court act in Obstruction of the Federal Individuals Disabilities Act (IDEA) Jurisdiction and Protections? Did the California District Court Collude with the Los Alamitos School to Circumvent Due Process under Federal Procedural Safeguards? Did the Court Falsify Documents/Record by Adding Proposed Conservatee’s Name as an Objector on the Opinion? Does the falsifying of Document/Record bias the in the furtherance of Due Process? Does the falsifying of the Document/Record cover up the violation of Due Process . and Procedure manipulate the reality of the case thereby denying Due Process? Did the California Court violate Due Process? . . Did the California Court violate Constitutional Parental Rights Jurisdiction Did the Central Justice Center act out of jurisdiction and violation of procedural custody Family Law Orders. There is a family law attorney of record from 2004 to date, Indu Srivastiv, Esq. Did Central Justice Center have jurisdiction to overturn Administrative Law Judge Decision in favor of proposed Conservatee and Appellant against Los Alamitos School District in the Office of Administrative Hearings? Did Central Justice Center have Jurisdiction and authority to adjudicate a Special Education case denying Proposed Conservatee and Appellant Federal Protections . 2 and germain law under IDEA Procedural Safeguards of the Individuals with Disabilities Education? Due Process Did the Central Justice Center violate Due Process by denying the trial to determine the mandatory settlement conference regarding 3rd parties? Judge Did the Public Defenders’ Office, Diane Ysaguire and Honorable Gerald Johnston violate due process and procedure by stating Gianna Gruewald, mediator, told the Public Defender someone was supposed to ask for a third party to at the trial date hearing decide (Exhibit )4-26-22 (4).pdf for a 3rd party GAL on the matter. The mistake gives the State all decision making without Due Process, Federal and Constitutional Protection relinquishing all rights and public costs for the care of Special Need Adult. The matter of 3rd parties is the issue set for trial. Did the court violate procedure and jurisdiction by taking a Special Education Case ; from an Education Law Firm in the Procedural Safeguard of Due Process, obstructing Independent Education Evaluation per procedural safeguards team of experts to Safeguard FAPE and recommendations for John Donathan II. IEE’s evaluators are expert witnesses. e Did the Central Justice Center unreasonably deny Evidence in violation of Procedure and Evidence Code in light of COVID Restrictions Court Closed Filings were submitted via email e Conflict of Interest Did 4th District, 3rd Division act in Conflict of Interest is accordance to In accordance with The federal conflict of interest rules are found at 18 U.S.C. § 208 with implementing regulations at5C.FR.§ | ° 2635.402. Appellant is requesting the case to be moved to another District Court and Court of Appeal due to the conflict of interest and inability to receive a fair hearing. The issues involve Mari Barke, president of the Orange County Department of Education School Board and her husband Dr. Jeff Barke who was the former President of the Los Alamitos Board of Education. The Respondents on this matter are the Orange County Public Defender's Office and Presiding Judge Gerald Johnston in the Probate Department who is at the helm of mistakes executed by these Orange County Agencies. It further extends to the Orange County Department of Education and the District Attorney’s Office. Orange County Board Supervisor Andrew Do represents Los Alamitos School District and is a former Assistant District Attorney. In addition, Orange County Supervisor Donald Wagner’s Assistant acted as campaign Manager for Mari Barke for reelection as OC School Board President. Mari Barke and District Attorney Todd Spitzer are friends and campaigned together. : e It is understandable and reasonable thes