Did the honorable Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Judge Joan A. Brown find the Commonwealth v. Frank Nellom, 565 A.2d 770 (Pa. Super.1989) Court Order establish acquittal

QUESTIONS PRESENTED A. Did the honorable Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Judge Joan A. Brown find the Commonwealth v. Frank Nellom, 565 A.2d 770 (Pa. Super.1989) Court Order establish acquittal. Prove fraud upon the court as follows: AND NOW this 12th day of March, 2014, upon consideration of the Motion for Expungement or Hearing of Frank Nellom requesting determination as to whether the Superior Court order stating "The primary Issue for the jury in this case was whether there had been forcible rape or consensual sexual Intercourse." Means both charges must be found again or result in a consensual and forcible sexual intercourse finding that does not constitute a crime. And any pleadings filed in opposition thereto? It is hereby Ordered and Decreed. 1 Motion is Granted 2 It being clear the not guilty and guilty verdicts that appear of record which followed the above stated law resulted in a consensual and forcible sexual intercourse finding that does not constitute a crime. Therefore the record referencing the Rape conviction shall be expunged. B. Does the United States Constitution, Amendment XIV. Require answer on the merit of the question raised by Pennsylvania Supreme Court, Chief Justice, Max Baer Notice to Plead, and Petitioner's reply thereto as follows: "The jury found Plaintiff guilty of rape, but acquitted him with respect to the IDSI charge." "Does the fact IDS! means rape, legal understanding that the above statement really means quilty of Rape, but acquitted him with respect to the Rape charge. Establish acquittal. Intent of the Frank Nellom Court. And, March 12, 2014, Order of Judge Brown. (Action For Declaratory Judgment Exhibit C). "Finding does not constitute a crime? 3 : |. TABLE OF CONTENT 4