Whether the district court erred in dismissing the petitioner's habeas corpus petition as untimely

No question identified. : QUESTIONG) PRESENTED S. Whether Ye United Shabes Mebrick Courk Northern Biskrick of Tadiana South Bend Divisions “Jodge’ Robert L. Wiles, Jr,” error in his decision making’, As Lo when denying he Pelibioner his Fair cights bo an Habeas Corpus proceeding, By © dismissing the Peliticner habeas Corps pebitien (ECF A) because ik is untimely. (review Peltronce’s App. E, pq. 125) 2». Whether Yhe Uniked Stakes Webrick Coork Norlhern Dakrick of Indiana South Bend Niwision’s “ Judge: Robert L, Miller, Je," abused his discreWion as be diereqarding the Pebiionee”s Gesk, Seeond, and Seventh ground, Ye supporbing Sacks wwvhin the Pelioner’s Pebibion under a8 U.S.C. 8 2254 for Writ of Wolbeas Corpve and Yre attached exhilriks wm Support ot Said ground (sy and Yheie Suppocking facks?, Thak in Sack proves Yok Yao Pebikicner Shall be enkiMed bo habeas Corpus relich, (reviews Pebbroner’s Kop. td, pa: 15-20, App. Ni, pq. 147-151, Kop! 0, pq. 1827/59, App: DB, pq. 20-25, App. N, Py. 147-161, kop O, pq. 152-189, App: 8, pq. Se 6O, and Apps F, pq. 15, within See.€) ) UTST OF PARTIES ) 5. Ron Neal, Warden RELATED CASES D, State v. MeCasher, Cause Wo. 1962-1362-FA2... 2.MeCaster v, Stabe, Cause Yo. TIAOY-I3Il-CR544... DHMcLasber v, Sake, Cause NO, 19h02-1503PC3 ves D,Molasber v, State, Cause No, TIKO2-IL05-PCO10, S.MecCaster v. Shale eb al, cavse No, Wd02-lkl|MI 224... wd Melaster v. Stabe, etal, Cause wo, BA-MIL-00749,,, DMeCaster v. Slabe, etal, cause Wo. B1F-CV01043... ),Melaster v. Stabe, Cause No. 20ASP-1238,,, .Melaster v, Stabe, Cause No. 10). MeCaster v, State, Cause No. 26A-PC-IFIY,. i), MeCaster v, Neal, Warden, Cause No. 3:21Cv-oos92,,, 12), WeCaster v, Neal, Warden, Cause Wo, 2I28i7.,, 19), Melaster v, Neal, Warden, Cause No. 21-7953,