No. 22-7457

Bruce Allen Buckner v. Daniel Porter, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-05-04
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: brady-violation civil-procedure civil-rights civil-stay constitutional-rights criminal-case criminal-procedure due-process judicial-bias obstruction-of-justice stay
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does a stay in one civil proceeding pending the outcome of a criminal case extend to all other civil proceedings stemming from the same criminal case?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

estions Presevted . Does_o Stay in one civil proceeding pemdiing \ne outcome ol o Ctimmal cose extend to oll other cwil proceeding stemming from Nhe some Coimmmal case 2 2Did_ Magistrate Tudge Shiva Hodges eco, oy oiling to extend the Stay she geared —___ the Defendants pending the State's ecto) —_ ___| case, to the Federal coiminal cose? 3. Did Senior Districh Coust Judge Tes yo mater ond. Magidvale Judge. Shiva Hodges how prejudice by willfully violating Hae Stoy to_peotect the Defendanfs, York Coury — _ Solicitor, Damel_ Poctec ond Yock County Cleck ond possible cciminal clasges Yor Sailing to ___ do theic _advwinisteotive duties intentionally ___ — violating Brady, producing Yalse_evidence enying the Pelitioneds Suxth Armed mei Cight to subposma_ond ccossexamine Sfotles witnesses ond denying tne Pelifioners Fourteenth Aynendment cue process tight te o -undomertolly Caic cciminal proceeding ? og 7 LS et Petition Foc Wet OF Cecfiocnch : Reuce Allen Bucknec Pro Se MacDougall _Coccectional Tstitubiog ISlb Old Gilliacd Rd Ridgemille, South Cocolima 29472 Tobie OF Conlent Page. He Toble Of Authoctties Queshon Presented a Opwions Jussdiction Pectiment Statutecy Provision Stotement. Of Facts Reason for. Geawbing Petition Conclusiog GH Cectificate OF Service ee ee | Tolle OF Authorities osbous Town Yacht Club Ship Owners Ass |, Sefe Becth Management, Inc GILE Supe. 2d, bh _L_USCAS 362(K) 0), Automatic Stay, 32 C.F R8 935.60, Subpoenas, 4 [® USCA 82, Principals B USCA & 3CIL Obstruction or Tnpeding — __ the Admuuistcotion of Juclica, { USCA S JH) Conspiracy Against Rights, _| Brady V. Macyland, 63 S.Ch S4 United States Conslifution Amendment Vi 2 | United States Consfifulion Avnend went X(Y 2 % USCA § 455, Disqualification of Justice, ludge. oc Magistrote Judge, Hick v. City of New York 2b £. Supp Ad 233 nm Se_looney BIZ E Ad 13H % USCA Rule $ Stay oc Tm ction fending ——___ ———[ Brpsal GON ana) (ante _—_" $ USCA 8 455 Disgualificote. of Juehice, Le — BUSCA S$ 1505, Obstruction of proceeding nl le $259.3 oh $5.8. D8 The Couch | faseerytess | Alcala V, Texos Webb County 625 F Supp 24341 Opimions [he Fousth Circut Couct OF Nopeals a ofticmech the Distsict Court dismissal sf | these _2cases, tain us slolished per cutiam pinisn_on_ December 20,2023., but the (5) Swe coses must be viewed os one action fo e_ths Total _pictuce of bins_ond Preyudics against the petifiones, oT usisdicfion | The, unpublished pes curiam opinion gcanls cectioraci teview tia The Sugceme xs ust_undes 2% USCA § 1254 (1), Therefore, the Supreme Couct tras jusischictiom, Pectiment Slatutocy Provision Undes 26 USCA S455, Disguatification of Justice, Judge oc Magistrate, Judge. “Tt wos Ine cuily of Magistcate Judge. Shiva Hedges O od Senioc _Disteich Coust Judge Tescy Woolen ro _hisqualily themself when their impoctiahty become questionable 9 | Tn_co boone, £23 Ebel. 788 celief From on ° Ulomotic slay requices_hatice ond heating. ot , TRY A -o_pro_se, T_stond-by the 1983 Cal Complaimits im these coses, but the wilful violation of the Stay nos denied my Fousteanth Amend vost due process tight tp dds the underlying comstitwtonal , Violstions tno Yundamewlally Lorr crumunal Ning. The fact the Defendants, work with the United Stofes Oisfeich Couct Dwiston OF hoc Hill ond these. Judges ono choy sis, hos cceated o bias and prejudice fhat_o_pro se petitioner com not ovec~ Come, ithout the Higher Couch _domg ifs jl fe , protect yny sights os on American Citizen, | Ressons Fer Graviling This Pefition = | Aso Supteme Court Judge, Justice oc Cle J fF should make you mac ond ashamed fo now that govermment employees have Turned __la blind eve on the constitulional violstions . hich you wock so hasd to protects Bub WY do wot _chonge the fact, my consiifutional ighits have been violdted and Tom erifitled __|to tha _celie? cequested, as a molar of low, ‘Ando jucy shod decide this matter ___Conclystow These cases would motte tia the Supceme Co acts jurisdiction, if Senioc Pidtcick

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-03-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 5, 2023)

Attorneys

Bruce A. Buckner
Bruce A. Buckner — Petitioner