No. 22-746
Damion Kentrell White v. United States
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: 28-usc-2255 due-process federal-procedure habeas-corpus plea-agreement sentencing statutory-maximum
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-03-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether due process requires that a provision in a plea agreement waiving the right to file a motion to vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 be construed as containing an exception that allows a motion challenging a sentence that exceeds the statutory maximum
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether due process requires that a provision in a plea agreement waiving the right to file a motion to vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 be construed as containing an exception that allows a motion challenging a sentence that exceeds the statutory maximum.
Docket Entries
2023-03-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
2023-02-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-02-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 13, 2023)
Attorneys
Damion Kentrell White
Philip J. Lynch — Law Offices of Phil Lynch, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent