Absence of decision on Fair Housing Act compliance

No question identified. : i. Petitioner questions the absence of the decision by the housing Units in compliance with che Federal Feir Housing Act of i968. 2. Petitioner questions <he tack of finding by eudge Cecchi third . _ Circuit District Cour: and the Rehearing of the EnRBanc Panel against the Respondent Borough of Bliendale for violations of the Rice Statutes for Money Laundering, mail fraud, wire fraud, under section 2 Titles 28 us code, tc invest directly or indirectly such ; vax Surplus income and receive acquisition ct the proceeds of such income and any interest in or establishment or operation of any interstate cr foreicn commerce thrceucgh collection through a pattern of rackketeeriang activity or through collection of an interest in cf conircl of any enterprise which is in the activities of which affect foreign enterorise ‘global interest ; funds). : 3. Petitioner questions the violation of Petitioners 14th Amendment Rights of Due Process and Ecual Protection for # 2 Bbove. q. i 4. Petitioner questions the violation of Doubling petitioners : Real Estate Taxes which were the ultimace foundation fer the loss of Petitioners Home and his equity $840,000.00pursuant to U.S. Code Title 18 Part i Chapter $6 1962. 9. Petitioner questions the absence of @ decision by the Appellate Division 3rd Circuit Philadelphia for a Builders Remedy award of Punitive and Compensatory Damages for the loss of equity from the Affordable Units now being Constructed in Allendale. by the respondent Borough of Allendale with partnership of é@ developer. 6. Petitioner questions the viclation of Plaintiffs Rights by the . Respondent Borough of Allendeie and Respondent Passaic River Coalition te collect on Judgment and Writ of Execution and filed lien on the 34 Building lots formally owned by Petitioner's vudgment debtor Jack Levin in the amount of $5,928,680.00 under the filed lien. Notice of Lis Pendens, Deed Description of Judge Robert C. Wilson and Writ of Execution filed under J-061371-i3. 7.Petioner questions the violation of respondent John Albohm to Geny recovery of the 2.5 acres owned by Judgment debtor Jack Levin for the Writ of Execution and filed lien as stated in #6 above. 8. Petitioner questions the absence of any decision by Judge Cecchi under Third Circuit application in support of the Petitioners Constitutional rights under Due Process and Equai . Protection, _ -_ 35> & a 9. Petitioner questions the lack of decision of the Third Circuit Court and the Appellate Courts to rule on Justice Harlan's : Decision in Sniadach v Family Finance Corp. 395 U.S. 337 (1969) 10. Petitioner Questions why Sudge Cecchi and the En Banc Panel Failed to enforce N.J.S.A. 54:4-1 Franklin Bank vs Parker 136 NJ Super 476, 346 A 2d 1973. ii. Petitioner Questions the lack of finding of the Bribe by the Emigrants Savings Attorney Richard Epstein wno paid two separate Payments to the Respondents Bergen County Sheriff's Dept. for nonnotice of the Sheriff's sale and the issuance of the Sheriff's. Deed, within the act of illegal foreclosure upon petiticners home. 12. Petitioner questions the 3rd District Court findings that failed to determine the falsity of the Budget reports which were displayed over wire to the "no Owner Occupied" residence and or explanation of the $43 million in surplus deposits by the CFO Paula Favate. 13. Petitioner questions thet both the 3rd District Court and the Appeai Panel En Banc failed acknowledge or rule these violations or the stolen interest earned illegally on the surplus money and failed to pay income tax to the Federal Government which violates the Equal Protection clause of the i4th Amendment. 14.Petitioner guestions why boSthe Courts failed to decide and mention the involvement of the SEC and the corrective action by the SEC which terminated ali parties involved in the crimes. -~4t 15. Petitioner questions why my Rights under the i4th Amendment were violated by the failure cf the Responcents to return my share of the s