Whether appointed Appellate Counsel's missapprehended the law and facts by failure to brief and raise the issues on appeal constitutes unreasonable if not ineffective assistance of appellate representation

No question identified. : QUESTION€S) PRESENTED ; ; I. Whether appointed Appellate €ounsel's missapprehended the law and facts by failure to brief and raise the following issues on appeal. constitutes unreasonable if not ineffective assistance of appellate representation. . 7 ‘II. Whether Petitioner has established the necessary cause and prejudice for leave to file a Successive Petitasn under the Act. A. Whether the Appellate and Illinois Supreme Court's decision which overlooked or _ missapprehended the law or facts with Smith/Bailey announced the new substantive rules of law conflicts with decisions of this Court. 'B. Whether the Lower Court's decision prejudice Petitioner's Smith/Bailey challenge . that is needed to vacate his unconstitutional sentence and conviction which conflicts with decisions of this Court.