Whether the U.S. District Court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims related to the seizure of their bank account and property without due process

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ZT, DolS Mot AMEMOTK A stow T /Qour werd LTE op. Tat moet 05 BoM TRKCY OBE Accouak 2 a XY TN AMEND B Could OME oW [1922 Pon pone Pd BE TACEU OCF MY ACLoUM. TS THD Wt comet? ey sHouLO mone KEEP UC Foe juste ® Yu Ds T1 ACen PR ME JO RE DY AQ-SGS POR A SUK. THE ODD wot HAMEM? By Fx fue THAT Mae Dy Bers PAKCY ORA MM Accoune Por THD AWE Walk AP(OUK Ae B. #6 MLE ING! Gust Le wsitMe ME < AT How CAN THEA DEMON U.5.H.Ce OCDE To TAKE DE osTTS OFF IY RCLOUWE AMD CLAY FOO) MoT TRMGLT AY POU cece, , 4, LEAYE.0© fo? Alou THE U.S, 0.6. CREGL OED I-13-22 TITLED MPBYOLY D GE Domne ¢ THEY ford MY MOVE | S% PLEATE Op dist Aloo THE £yT.F,5.A10 RE BSH vol TT (Rove TH Beer TAKeW my Mowe Stee 4p. T AW Pho CEUT oF ASSUALT & WAS WOOWOPLLLY CoMUEUED.