No. 22-7493
Glen Thomas Dotson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process eighth-amendment federal-bureau-of-prisons first-amendment medical-treatment retaliation standing
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was Petitioner's First Amendment Right violated when he was retaliated by Federal Bureau of Prisons staff for exercising his right to pursue his lawsuit against them?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Question: Was Petitioner's First Amendment Right violated when he was retaliated by Federal Bureau of Prisons staff for exercising : his right to pursue his lawsuit against them? Question: Was Petitioner's Eighth Amendment Right violated when the ; Federal Bureau of Prisons staff failed to provide him medical treatment during a hunger strike? i.
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-07
Waiver of right of respondents Bureau of Prisons, et al. to respond filed.
2023-03-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 8, 2023)
Attorneys
Bureau of Prisons, et al.
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Glen T. Dotson
Glen Thomas Dotson — Petitioner