Joel Armando Rodriguez v. United States
JusticiabilityDoctri
Whether the district court improperly expanded Guideline § 1B1.3 by including as relevant drug weight uncorroborated statements of two cooperating defendants who attributed a significant amount of methamphetamine to the petitioner, thus elevating his offense level, and the Fourth Circuit erred in holding this was relevant conduct, even though the petitioner was only charged with and pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute cocaine
No question identified. : No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES October Term, 2022 PRR RK ER KEE KERR RRR KE RRR RRR RRR ERR RRR RE RRR KEK ER RR RK RRR KER EK i JOEL ARMANDO RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent KREINER IK RRR ERR RE R ERR ERIK RE RE RRR RAKE EKER REE KEREREKRER ERK PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT KR KK IKK KEE RE RRR EKER ER EK RRR RE KKERREKRRKARRR