No. 22-750
Nathan D. Crisp v. Georgia, et al.
Response Waived
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess Securities
SocialSecurity DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference:
2023-04-14
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can the State of Georgia use a perjury and forgery guilty plea and perjury First Offender to bypass Petitioner Sgt. Crisp's jury trial and due process rights to convict him? Can Appeals Court and District Courts support a Void Judgment?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : | a Federal Questions A United States Court of Appeals has decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts with relevant decisions of this Honorable Supreme Court. Can the State of Georgia use a perjury and forgery guilty plea and perjury First Offender to bypass Petitioner Sgt. Crisp’s jury trial and due process rights to convict him? Can Appeals Court and District Courts ; support a Void Judgment?
Docket Entries
2023-04-17
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023.
2023-03-09
Waiver of right of respondents Gwinnett County, Georgia; Tuwanda Rush Williams to respond filed.
2023-02-14
Waiver of right of respondents Georgia, et al. to respond filed.
2022-12-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 13, 2023)
Attorneys
Georgia, et al.
Stephen John Petrany — Georgia Department of Law, Respondent
Gwinnett County, Georgia; Tuwanda Rush Williams
Elizabeth B. Taylor — Gwinnett County Georgia Law Department, Respondent
Nathan D. Crisp
Nathan D. Crisp — Petitioner