Are U.S. judicial officers required to process court forms from all litigants regardless of race or ethnicity?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1.) Are U.S. judicial officers presiding over civil cases required to process standard court forms such as Applications for Requests for Entry of Default, from ALL litigants, REGARDLESS OF THEIR RACE OR ETHNICITY? More specially, should Black litigants, such as the Plaintiff/ Appellant be afforded the same rights as White litigants to have his correctly completed and timely submitted CIV-100-Application for Request for Entry of Default’ form processed by the trial court? 2.) Are U.S. trial judges presiding over civil matters required to report direct evidence of crimes that arise from a case to the appropriate authorities for criminal prosecution? 3.) Should U.S. courts which do not allow preemptive challenges be required to implement mandatory random selection processes for the assignment of judges and justices to cases? The format shall be respected; however, this question requires further NECESSARY DETAIL, to understand why all courts MUST either offer a preemptive challenge option or require mandatory random selection, as reduces conflict of interest, amongst judges and mitigates court corruption. Without one or the other, judicial officers have the power to target specific litigants for reasons of bias. Studies have shown that courts have racial bias toward Black litigants such that the option of either preemptive challenger or mandatory random selection is a must for Black litigants. “PLEASE READ “NECESSARY DETAILS REGAEDING QUESTION No.3” of the Statement of Case section of this petition ON PAGE 19. i