No. 22-7505

Charles Alfred Armajo, Jr. v. Bridget Hill, Attorney General of Wyoming, et al.

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-05-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel procedural-default standard-of-review
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-06-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the panel of the Tenth Circuit err by improperly deciding the merit of an appeal before the court to justify the denial of a certificate of appealability?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : . UESTION’S PRESENTED L Did the panel of the Tenth Circuit err by improperly deciding the merit of an appeal before the court to justify the denial of a certificate of appealability? II. Has the Supreme Court of the United States overturned its own precedent in Buck v. Davis, 137 S.Ct. 759 (2017); Trevino v. Thaler, 133 S.Ct. 1911 (2013); and Martinez v. Ryan, 566 U.S. 1 (2012). Where this court decided that a procedural default would not bar a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel; when collateral proceeding was the first place to challenge a conviction on ground of ineffective assistance? Il. Does the Supreme Court decision in Buck v. Davis violate the equal protection of law, where it allows a different standard of review for state prisoners as compared to federal prisoners who are similarly situated? i

Docket Entries

2023-06-05
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/1/2023.
2023-05-10
Waiver of right of respondents Bridget Hill, Attorney General of Wyoming, et al. to respond filed.
2023-04-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 9, 2023)

Attorneys

Charles A. Armajo, Jr.
Charles Alfred Armajo Jr. — Petitioner
Hill, Att'y Gen. of WY, et al.
Jenny Lynn CraigOffice of the Wyoming Attorney General, Respondent