Does an out-of-court settlement agreement set the parameters for future legitimate correctional goals?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ~ 1.) Does and Out 6f Court Settlement Agreement "Set the Perimeters" a for future so-called Legitimate Correctional Goals in a specific instance?? ; Or does a supposed legitimate correctional goal ‘negate!’ a previous Out of Court Settlement?? Or did they abrogate that right? 2.) Does one Doctor's opinion negate “many Doctor*s" opinion, who agree that a particular Chronic Medical condition is in fact painful? 3.) Also, does a supposed Legitimate Correctional Goal allow Prison Administrators to violate a prisoners 1st Amendment Right to be free from consistent retaliation??? ; 4.) Is it Constitutional to deny an “open medical prescription" that a prisoner has been receiving for decades? (Harmless medication.) . 5.) Can "$Monetary concerns" be used to . treatment?? Even though that prisoner has a previous Out of Court settle° ment, that already agreed to pay for all medical bills? , 6.): When a prisoner offers to sign a "Disclaimer" for medical treatment in order to continue "Rehabilitative Efforts," does that constitute a denial of the right to refuse treatment when prison officials refuse to accept it? (Non-life threatening.) 7.) Can the same Judge (Magistrate), in one Case, "dismiss" another case that agrees with the premise ruled on in the present case? 8.) Also, can a (supposed) legitimate correctional goal be justified as legitimate even if the "motive is corrupt.?" 9.) Is it Constitutional to force a prisoner to accept a Magistrate Judge in a Civil Suit? ; 7 10.) When the Director of all prisons makes a decision on a Grievance filed by a prisoner, is it binding on lower level prison administrators?? . (2)