Does the double jeopardy protection still hold the promise and guarantee of the prohibition and protection from being twice placed in jeopardy for the same offense?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Under a certified question of law; Does (1) the double jeopardy protection contained within the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, still hold the promise and guarantee of the (a) prohibition and (b) protection from one being twice placed in jeopardy for the same offense? And; (2) if that being placed twice in jeopardy, of life and limb — into jeopardy, which led to a second trial and ultimate conviction, in direct violation of clearly established federal law, as determined by the United States Supreme Court, in the matter of Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932) and the decision more recent in United States v. Dixon, 509 U.S. 688 (1993)? And; _ (3) does a successful act of fraud upon the court, in violation of the Supreme Court decision in Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford, 64 8. Ct. 997 (1944); by former Oklahoma County Assistant District Attorney Robert Bradley Miller, who, in conducting the second trial, successfully suppressed the first trial before the same judge and same assistant public defender, clearly misleading the jury? And; (4) if the “acts of government officials” are in further violation of Title 18 U.S.C. Section § 242, “conspiracy,” a related provision of federal law, entitled Petitioner to have his Petition for Writ of Certiorari Granted, where under Title 18 U.S.C. Section § 241, makes if a crime for “two or more persons [to] conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person ...in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States[.]” {thus making the conspiracy a criminal conspiracy in addition to a civil rights violation}. Does this not warrant double indifference? )