Whether the Trial Court erred in dismissing the case

QUESTIONS PRESENTED . 1) Whether the Trial Court erred as a matter of law by dismissing Petitioner’s case based upon the Lower Court claims that Petitioner failed to state a claim and the basis for the Court’s jurisdiction and failure to comply with federal rules of civil procedure, which are all fictitious arguments based on the fact that Petitioner was in full compliance with all the above-stated violations. 2) Whether the Trial Court abused its discretion in refusing to review and . examine the complaint and all the supporting exhibits and the denial of the . motion to proceed in forma pauperis, which is a privilege and a right, and therefore violates constitutional guarantees, ‘such as due process, right to redress grievances, freedom of speech and access to the court. , iii iv) PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Petitioner, Noel Vincent Thomas, respectfully request the issuance of a writ of certiorari to review the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. OPINIONS BELOW The opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is unpublished and reprinted in the