Whether Petitioner has a federal Constitutional right to equal protection & equal application under the law & rule to a business purpose hardship drivers license as 'any person' similarly situated?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether Petitioner has a federal Constitutional right to equal protection & equal application under the law & rule to a business purpose hardship drivers license as “any person” similarly situated? Whether Petitioner has a federal Constitutional right to practice freedom of religion by issuance of a business purpose hardship drivers license for means to get to & from his choice of religious establishment? Whether Petitioner who has, & continues to suffer, significant hardships by the suspension of his “unrestricted” drivers license simply for his inability, thus failure to pay past criminal court costs, fines & fees, has a federal Constitutional right to the pursuit of livelinood' by legal means of issuance of a business purpose hardship drivers license as “any person” under the State's statutory & rule construction scheme & intent? THIS IS A CASE OF FIRST IMPRESSION 1 In a Georgia drivers license case, this Court decided a drivers license is a Constitutional right in the pursuit of livelihood. See Bell v. Burson, 402 U.S. 535, 539 (1971) (Once licenses are issued, as in petitioner's case, their continued possession may become essential in the pursuit of livelihood.). ii