Whether the jury needs to be unanimous, to decide on elements that are the causation of deprivation under 18 USC 2412, and whether specifically instructions not to be unanimous on the specific act(s) is constitutional

No question identified. : 2 c al i Queshens PRESENTED. GB whether the yuo vecds to be ua mous, tv Fide on elemats that are the causation oF de PAWATIOn UNVEZ IDUSC 2412, and where spect catly wetructinie not ty be wiAWimous on the speanfic act(s) ts (2) whether a private pertow Can be comvicledl of-1% +(e at prvele peltorn is wot Ache jojtly with @ nublic o Fhaal, awd thatths vs tutiona 3) whether a~ Comyi chon Stawd where i+ was obthwed False evidence provided by aoNernment poeats And ther Welwesses, Violates Due Froce (4) whether oO GIVEG ent Na ony Expert Nex Copdltand SUENCe a) gh. w her ' del be ateiY ODFUSCAIES jl Fo ecu pao ty to the Pedetiower is Const tutiwal erro. List oF Paenes Au parc ppeal iw the CePA o e case on nN 2 aNe PAQGG : : Table °F Comlewts _ | Ruestinns Presented a 7 TABLE OF AVL THOtINES | W~iij _ lO PIWien BELOW i 7 AAS Dicrion 2 Conse Turloval PRN \Stons La volved | 3 TatemenT OF THE CASE a Reasons Fot CQawTivg THE Wait” +36 onelysion AQpetA L &0 Pudied oF the 8th etreutt oo Dopendx & — ecdee ded Wq Cehearing Appendty C Cell tower bof depicted MAP Prppealdix DCel wet ~ plotted beta USe ~ MAP FapLe OF AutHe@tie Noncens di Vi vew Yers 530 ws UbG 121314, 20 Ack USee€ feugle V Central Suc lox E Supp Y4Y za Rcepor Y Beooks _(athere 2008) FE AkKins Vv Fppesle Sep F 3d UTB 32 Brown V US. Zoy F2d 24 2 nabs V Richmond Vie Police Depks 22 = he Timerson Vi Paywe YL F 24 UNG 32 Miller Vo Pate 3%b6 US V2 IN&Pwe Vi TULNolS Seo USseoy 4,24 32 Neder V US. 527 usa 1S OuerceA V UT. 229 US 466 Ze Richardson V Us, 526 US 313 13 Rver@ VY Tee S76 US INY 16 ‘Screws VOUS. 325 us J| le 2 SOurr VOWS. \t4y Us \ Sullivan) Vv Lewis av S03 US 2i5 1s” Taylor V lsr S20 F 2d loo le Wernccy Vi Cara 136 5. CF, 1002 log 24 wesk NV AtkiesS 16% us Yo 22 Wilson WV Lawtence Cy 2e E3d Wb FZ U.S. VN AQurs U2F as 4} 4, 24 Wes. Vv Baud 758 US 250 me wt WS. Y classic 33 us Zz14 v\ WSN Cooma Fe ge WEE _Ny 21,23 WS Vv Dania a S69 US 59+ 7 Tle ues. V Espinete Su 3t2EO zy U-S, V Molly “ee F 3a 1292 1ST U.S. V hacnace-EcKeo Gor F 3d 3%b FE? US. V Peae BR US FOR 1G 2UF uU-S.V Rages 314 ws. $15 ir _ | Urs. V Rodelly ANF US Oisrtems eos =o U.S V Shaw 891 € 3d YH ie us V Teverwelee 9° Fe F Supp 4 7 mu 2 ee US-V While. B63 F 3d 4¢4 zo __ . vy “A IN THE ; SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Petitioner respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment below. OPINIONS BELOW . \\ we For cases from federal courts: , The opinion of the United States court of appeals appears at