Jordan Nathaniel Mitchell v. John Stone, et al.
Whether the petitioner was deprived of due process and equal protection rights when confined for 4 months without conviction and denied medical treatment
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : g T the Filed Sa this Coust BeSce in. Regacds te Ske vate) CAS] HE Al72I7,2 GueStion ry 6) | bce Here Fad Saal the Lanne oe forse! Deprived “tas SS to Stith, nour Bote have Rule And rBDelibecately pyle 1 UME Ste S@ Unloastdbonals. (Fre Mence Rod Very 0 = WAS ConfSned for 4 months” /\2, days fom 30H, Yo 910220, 35 WAS Net Convicted Changes” wee C)594\ SSed, TS) 4 HS FANS Tepe Soarmest? # Duclag My False Trp Somes Pere Z was 1A Pan Kad Sudeep From Left Ankle Tuy vad By way °F Government Shut-dewn Causing Dee Yrocess Vi alahons, Crancelied Agpantmeds, Medical Neg beter Presesi phen Soon "4 Dacheo Oder when Got to Tay), What Wighrs De ARN have. to Deny A WDoctocs order After Com: mg aut of aspNalle hn