No. 22-7521
John Earnest Skrdla v. Oklahoma
IFP
Tags: constitutional-review criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel oklahoma-court-of-criminal-appeals state-court-appeals strickland-standard strickland-v-washington
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals ruled in contrary to Strickland v. Washington
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . 1. Whether the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals ruled in contrary to Strickland v. : Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687(1984) when it determined Petitioner’s trial counsel , __ was not ineffective? ; : i . i | Contents STATUTES AND RULES |
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-02-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 9, 2023)