No. 22-7521
John Earnest Skrdla v. Oklahoma
IFP
Tags: constitutional-review criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel oklahoma-court-of-criminal-appeals state-court-appeals strickland-standard strickland-v-washington
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals ruled in contrary to Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687(1984) when it determined Petitioner's trial counsel was not ineffective?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals ruled in contrary to Strickland v. Washington
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-02-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 9, 2023)
Attorneys
John Earnest Skrdla
John Earnest Skrdla — Petitioner