No. 22-7525

Joseph S. Barone v. The Lawyer's Fund for Client Protection, et al.

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2023-05-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: case-facts civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process fact-finding judicial-immunity judicial-misconduct legal-procedure
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference: 2023-06-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does judicial immunity apply when a judge rewrites the facts of a case in order to achieve a pre-determined result?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Does judicial immunity apply when ajudge rewrites the facts ofa case (which, , by such a procedure, have just become fictions) in order to achieve a pre-determined result? 1

Docket Entries

2023-06-26
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/22/2023.
2023-06-06
Waiver of right of respondents The Lawyer's Fund for Client Protection, et al. to respond filed.
2023-05-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 12, 2023)

Attorneys

Joseph S. Barone
Joseph S. Barone — Petitioner
Joseph S. Barone — Petitioner
The Lawyer's Fund for Client Protection, et al.
Andrea OserOffice of the New York State Attorney General, Respondent
Andrea OserOffice of the New York State Attorney General, Respondent