No. 22-7535

Delroy Booth v. Lieutenant R. Allen, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2023-05-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: administrative-exhaustion administrative-remedies civil-rights damages discretionary-review district-court-jurisdiction due-process judicial-procedure prisoner-rights procedural-standards remedy-exhaustion retaliation
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals erred in affirming the district court's dismissal of the petitioner's complaint alleging retaliation, denial of due process, and failure to exhaust administrative remedies

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : : FRaog OQ Crags } QES TION sy PRESENT ED WOK Ane Dieta Loot\ Vere wy Soa Ronke rewiring Gekcie oer Raawe Ch WMT Cox Comin Damaagy Vere a Restonsive Neakiny Was Fed Sy Ane Dantas? R.Es TydseA WAokice & AHR Contant an Reels Sabitihy ka NOS Procedkure AORy Ree ok Ane SSRN Stage 2 3. Does SRA ater Deelk’s Camel ant, AWA, ag ebTechieny Aemonshe ak Wok ALoanishradine Dame Keg MAY NOL have Been, SNe Ae by muck Wack Wis Conor As exhavsh Wooi\ Re RXru seh 2 Wo Es Fey NRT Hoolh's oh Ams foe MRK ANd Fanokronch AAT, Fon Soave Darwher Congieced he Se FWWelous as te Uacrant Asomoval AK Yar SSERNAN Stage ov Ane WAR avny ARKon 2 S.s fanlure Xo RRAnrvyk Mmwadhtaline Remedies Savi ere) Lo® & AK RRronadive Melase iced Sy Me Bek ndonds 3 6. Dees a VT anskee From One Reisen be Ane Nerd Reise NMRA Neithongs Books Rack Bacnaags WAM Foo ng Mah and Emohienal FaToeigs Wey % Wien Shoring oa Rnysiea\ Rosory? 1. Redadionee Roh Snattendgs Ane Lismigsa From Rng Weaver, reg, 4 Qouck rN RARReaks Hes ok Qourk, Accerh ay Sug Lekhionge Pool, NRSSion Sevens ANS Anse Anosa <ventrindne \i shy mosh Fone rabiy 48 why wane? B_ Bees Aye anrted Bodas SRTAAR, Cour Wong EN Bashrockion Lae Ak a\ Rasessolents ine Fatoowia, Lavtecits Rava, Facoa\ Aiiacakions Nas ko Be WWE a Raven of re ® ANTES? ee TERK FAQer of QR. ey QUEST SOEs) PRESENTER FAQ S Aner Ewhaushion & adeninidtraive Renedieg Is god Wemonstrated OA Re Cace K€ Ane Comalarnky De Courks Mave ~e Kekkain From SAINI a Kuck Fin Bing {ose Ss Xo ES¥auhigh Vt q IS BoWs We Khare Meath Cook dd ASReals have Asincticabion, Xs Ranier a Mskaek Pourh’y Agcision Xo Nake SU cia\ DON ge Later AN Roose kK ALScrR Mo Shanda)? Wane Feindousness AMaeminnkion AS 9 Siserekionaey one, He is anissad OALeR AS Owsig. VANS GA) LrRer\ . *“ y Ren wel For abuse of Vscre ion? “s \2. wk ne Blravendiy eiteush Courk vw A&feals eeted &y NRroginy ne Decision Aa Disktich Coorhs Decvieh aS Tailor Vo &haush PrAmaaAy se AR BRM, Frnislous, Ac Wikyout NN x Rerten sive Wea din \f VARA By Whe DRRadands x | BDAY Ag Alwends Ciceark Coorh J Atted\s RKTeq Sy nok ky NY \ FwWo We Veocesy Yor Raselving Meine Ao Sismin Ye itongn Wish R AY fou Fo lore x0 Wash AAMAS ROR Dematies? 1H Does WHSOAK'S aye Marts de fig WS3 lattsihy For Ronihivg Bama 8 For Mama and Kmokional insurieg MA ReVon Unyrige) AoTory 5. we Revo WARS Gaa\ Askin Vos ath ‘ / wee 7) g L a4 & ip * q@ : Aa~ 4 u A @ ’ rs 2, ft 7 a pa L 7 a a a ¢ Y a 24 ¢ 4] af g 7 re a g aa * 4 ; g 4 a A b ‘0 a 4 2 r zg x | a A 4 . a Tole of Nother ites inant W. BRerAA. CARH) = CoHE 2 Benalonk v, WerandserClaga) Kaog BY Ross V. Bake aol G? Kane 3 Sones v_ Bock Caoord ~agey By Na Warr ~ Jno Mas Cao) Laney Vooner v, Surnst de C3008) ~Karg y SORE V, Kimbeeret\ ¢ ole) — Sage 5 ones w_ Boel< CASO) Lage § Basham No Thomas 6 Ao\\) Fase S Beaxoanny Verna nde AAV) Sane 6 Facrow NL Was LdXeo 3). Lage G BRshelie v, GSambeel CATE). Tage G SOARS NBock C Aso). agen Jones yy. Soak (8909) . fag \4 Paatson NI, “Vay lor CAe\G)CAAT AS TRENT NW Boeagide (aoa) ~age\s Treva wv, Asbeek a -Bry+on Dek. Ue. Faye \s White x. Ree Hee GAS\1D Kage 15 Rass v. Shake Cae) Xage \S TAvRo Stes Caetty. Rage ts Cooelbark vw, Lee Ssumhy Coan) Rage 1S Ross V. Blake CQoi¢_ Taye \G AS CAM VW Let aly) Rage ie Torte Ny. Bor nsi Se Cavog 5 . Rage \G MART sy nner CAA4)_ Page ic . What ty Ni Warden Wane Trae Fagen (Qi) ~LAse Roses Ve LOL4 CAad3DKage ® 4} OWaAS V. Oko ce. LVASQ) ~ face \R o Pare kyotee PAvy Te Book 09 Wear cer ahead WM dual, WA abe) As AION LOoPARy Ae HA GS 11BQ AWE alehiong SW KonShPoah Ti AwAS vader Ae Gatked SeARY Sens oV. re Gnrtel Srakas Drier Covel For Ae norkweran Dhei Av Corer Ni, wad Uriked Shekey Courts AN BRadd Fey She Elev wy tActunk Wag ~ Tusshar dx \near Bek Sivner Forkn’y AR eal. | Conshtohiohell ANd Soh vaory Yrovinoh$ Ravolved Stobokes _ AX Ouse gy VAA\ ABW GSE. RRA AB O-S.e. WAVE CAD HA Gs .e \WSQ HA CS. Ce LQQ5 @ Qe) ; | a Page \ K 18Senenyy Fos The Recor &, Pelonec Body Wald like to Addsess Reasons Why Thi

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-02-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 12, 2023)

Attorneys

Delroy Booth
Delroy T. Booth — Petitioner
Delroy T. Booth — Petitioner