No. 22-7541

Luis Nunez-Romero v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-05-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 8-usc-1229 administrative-law due-process immigration-law immigration-removal notice-to-appear removal-order removal-proceedings statutory-interpretation ultra-vires
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Environmental DueProcess Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2023-06-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a putative notice to appear that does not contain the time and place of removal proceedings, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1229(a)(1)(G), is ultra vires, and if so, whether the resulting removal order is ultra vires

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED In order to initiate immigration removal proceedings under 8 U.S.C. § 1229(a)(1)(G), the government must serve a single notice to appear (NTA) containing all required information, including the time and place of removal proceedings. Niz Chavez v. GarJand, 141 §.Ct. 1474, 1479, 1486 (2021). The question presented is: Whether a putative notice to appear that does not contain the time and place of removal proceedings, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1229(a)(1)(G), is ultra vires, and if so, whether the resulting removal order is ultra vires.

Docket Entries

2023-06-12
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/8/2023.
2023-05-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2023-05-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 12, 2023)

Attorneys

Luis Nunez-Romero
Tamara CrepetFederal Public Defender, Petitioner
Tamara CrepetFederal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent