Whether the 9th Circuit denied due process in dismissing the petitioner's appeal

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Petitioner was denied due process in U.S. Court Of Appeals, For The , 9th Circuit in Form 14. Motion; for Extension of Time, in reply to | this 9th Circuit's Time Schedule Order-court filed 7-12-21. 2. As related to above above item #1, Petitioner requested "Brief" in . "Response", "requested new due date",which was signed/dated 7-14-21, the same date Petitioner rec'd via USPS on 7-14-21, which had "7-12-21" Neopost date with zip 94103 from Clerk,for 9th Circuit, zip 94119-3939. 3. As related to above item #s 1. & 2., "The part#esshali meet the following time schedule". "Tue., 9-7-21", “Pai lure of the appellant to comply with the Time Schedule Order will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal". Petitioner has not rec'd any further 9th Circuit filing(s) since its last dated 7-12-21. The 9th circuit errored in not providing its reply to above "Form 14." "Motion for Extension of Time" & that "denied" Petitioner's right to "due process". 4. As related to above item #1. 2. & 3., by denying"due process", the 9th Circuit's "automatice dismissal, on its as well as rendering the Bill of Rights a meaningless judicial process under > the Rule of Law. The parent of the foregoing,factual prevailing & mitigating circumstance(s),in the Declaration of Independence, another casualty in the judicial process under the Rule of Law, too!!! 5. The public's trust, confidence & faith in the U.S. Supreme Court must not be-ccpmpromised by not having a court hearing todétermine whether ‘ the 9th Circuit did in deed "deny" this above "due process". The Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court know, our judic#alprocess under. the Rule of Law-today is at a whereas a civil division _ of equal portion(s) currently exists, undisputable fact!!! , —W) 1 : QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : 6. Whether the original/or otherwise of the Constitution, there can not be intent/ a U.S. Supreme Court or any court, any Rule that's fixed-not subject to a discretionary exception, especially not applicable as a . discrimination, because open to other(s) not just one single set or otherwise circumstance(s) for "a discretionary exception!!! This case meets this criterion, beyondé the 9th Circuit's "automatic dismissal" date, due,to factual prevailing & mitgating circumstance(s), as ' addressed, in Petitioner's signature & date of this Motion For leave To Proceed IN FORMA PAUPERIS with attched Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari 7. The Petitioner being a permanent, physically disabledperson under ADA of 1990 & side-effects from Rxs in the foregoing & having a Dyslexia condition & COVID-19 circumstance(s) & now at"risk for worsening | Cardiac death", establishes as evidence in support for above item #6, "discretionary exception" in all its highest scales of justice!!! The best interestsof judicially-justice is here for the entire society of the U.S.A. under the grace of GOD, the U.S.A. was founded on, which — every Justice anywhere adheresto under solemn oatht!! It's treason to the Constitution by anyJustice to betray that "oath!!! : 8. What's here is the 9th Circuit's error in "automatic: dismissal", that denys "due process", as all the above attests to, only alternative . is for the U.S. Supreme Court to accept this case for a determination either way!!! This demonstrates that trust, confidence & faith in judicial process under the Rule of Law, actually exists, not some secret, behind door(s) letter from this Court stating-."denied" without explanation!!! That on its face Unconstitutional, no wonder in Re: above item#5. om QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 9. When the Constitution is silent, then the concept,of original intent or otherwise,obliged to step in. If, judicial process under the Rule of Law, for the greater good, within a national society exists. The trump that opens the door for exception, when an injustice,against one, is an "injustice against all!!! That paramount "trump" is "the greater good"!!! It then follows that a judicial opinion rendered, be based on