No. 22-7558

Mike Vigil v. Midas International Corporation, et al

Lower Court: Nevada
Docketed: 2023-05-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights criminal-procedure default-judgment disability-act due-process elder-abuse elder-exploitation felony fraud intentional-fraud service-of-process standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2024-01-05 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Supreme Court should grant certiorari to review the intentional fraud and felony conduct by the defendants in the lower courts

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : ORY ucéonis) Paesenren IRREFUTABLE INTENTIONAL FRAUD FELONY. '? . ; This Appeal of Certiorari Does Not Arisé on an“rtor of fact, , : The Appeal Arises from. the Supreine Court of the State-OF” ; Nevada and Trial pistrict cotit: Clark County of Las Vegas ‘Nevada. . _ It is consisting continuous of taintéd Felonies a Crime of a Graver or moré serious nature than designated as a Error.or a : Misdemeaners 18 U.S.C.A. 8 1 , Many States Penal or Critiinal Codes Define status Crimes and. certain. States in turn also various: clases of felonies ( eg. Class A.B, cto. ) “wit Sentences for " Exploitatiotiof the tost Vulnerable Elderly Pettioner's Age 77/409 : 4 ‘ | the Supteme ‘court of Nevada and the trial court District of Clark * County Criminal Net: 4g a’ Clase B Félony and in ‘Volation: Of the , Former is actual Positive, Intential rradd: All Fraud acts” “os ~ will be Supported by Petitioner’ Irrefutable Evidence Presented. (On {DESERLet Judge (SC) Justiees Criminal: FRAUD ADPENBINES WA — J _ 1) * R JOHNSON, CHTD., will appear as Counsel for INTERNATIONAL. 4 | CORPORATION and OCEAN AUTOMOTIVELLC. Defined under NRCP 4.2 (c) (1) (A)APLEm | Tel: (702) 362-6. Be pt "8/10/2022 8:15.mannger Contacte INTERNATIONAL CORP. Contacts Law Firm = " ‘Above for 5, /22 Datea: LAS Petitioner Mike vigil 277 fe Las wy, who SRE nan CRE ASSat kc Sia as oY. ol Siaaiicr Patina cia ae Oe aE EE _ GD,

Docket Entries

2024-01-08
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-12-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-10-10
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-01
Waiver of right of respondent Midas International Corporation, et al. to respond filed.
2023-05-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 15, 2023)

Attorneys

Midas International Corporation, et al.
Gina M. MushmecheKravitz Schnitzer Johnson Watson & Aeppenfeld, CHT, Respondent
Gina M. MushmecheKravitz Schnitzer Johnson Watson & Aeppenfeld, CHT, Respondent
Mike Vigil
Mike Vigil — Petitioner
Mike Vigil — Petitioner