No. 22-7563

Joseph I. Wilkes v. Ohio

Lower Court: Ohio
Docketed: 2023-05-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-procedure appellate-rights constitutional-rights delayed-appeal due-process equal-protection fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment plain-language trial-court-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2023-06-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution were violated when a request for delayed appeal was denied

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS) PRESENTED a . ; Whether the Fifth and Fourteenth’ Amendnent to the United States Constitution were violated when a request for delayed appeal was denied . : . for a defendant who had not been notified of his appellate rights by the ‘court nor counsel, oe oe Question. IT: el. . . , | Whether the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States ‘Constitution were violated when a request for delayed appeal was denied | > ‘that contained an error in the exercise of trial court jurisdiction which — ; may only be presented on appeal. oo . | a a Whether the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment to the United States me Constitution were violated when the Court of Appeals went beyond the . plain language of Oh. R. App. P.. 5. and denied the “request for delayed direct appeal after making a sufficiency determination on reasons -given . a for the delay. a

Docket Entries

2023-06-12
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/8/2023.
2023-05-17
Waiver of right of respondent State of Ohio to respond filed.
2023-05-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 15, 2023)

Attorneys

Joseph I. Wilkes
Joseph I. Wilkes — Petitioner
Joseph I. Wilkes — Petitioner
State of Ohio
Vicki Lynn DeSantisStark County Prosecutor' s Office, Respondent
Vicki Lynn DeSantisStark County Prosecutor' s Office, Respondent