The United States Attorneys and the U.S. Attorney General, vested with such dignity and power, are especially entrusted with the duty to protect the interests of all people...

ISSUES PRESENTED 1. No one is above the law. Local, State and Federal judges are not above the law. Local, state and federal judges who assume that they are above the law should realize the following: a. that they can be impeached or otherwise removed from the bench; b. that their law license is at risk; c. severe sanctions including disbarment may be imposed; d. their financial assets and real property assets may be seized; e. ownership, possession and control of their assets may be forfeited; and f. that they may be prohibited from ever again holding any public office. , “The United States Attorneys and the U.S. Attorney General, vested with such dignity and power, are especially entrusted with the duty to protect the interests of all people...” United States v. Butler, 567 F.2d-885, 894 (9% Cir. March 15, 1978). The idealism of our democracy is undermined and subverted when local, state and federal judges (“Judges”) and other officers of the court knowingly and intentionally acquiesce to and in many cases participate in criminal conspiracies i. being committed in rea] estate foreclosure proceedings. Id at 894. 2. The U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment Freedom of Speech includes: a. The Right to Access the Courts; b. The Right to Expose Corruption in the Court(s); c. The Right to Petition the Court for redress of grievances; d. The Right to be heard in a meaningful manner and at a meaningful time; and e. The right to a fair and impartial judge and a jury. 3. Superior Court Judge Jenna Whitman (“Judge Whitman”) , Superior Court Judge Noel Wise (“Judge Wise”), of Alameda County, California Federal District Court Judge James Donato, Federal District Court Judge Jon Tigar (collectively herein referred to as “the Judges”), and their co-conspirators, accomplices, surrogates and proxies have weaponized the judicial branches of the State and Federal government(s) in order to achieve the goal(s) of their conspiracy and successfully complete their “end game” which includes, among others, the commission of the substantive crimes including but not limited the following: a, to commit Domestic Terrorism; b. to finance Domestic Terrorism; : c. to destroy the democracy of the United States; d. to disrupt the economy of the United States; e. to overthrow and undermine the government of the United States; f. to commit the crime of sedition; . ii. g. to commit the crime of subversion; h. to commit the crime of Misprison of treason; i. to commit the crime of.a Misprison of felony; j. to commit the crime of Honest Services Fraud; k. to violate the Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations (“RICO”), : 1. to gain ownership and control of all real estate in the United States; and m. to gain control of the U.S. [Dollar] currency. Real estate in the United States is the foundation for the U.S. [Dollar] currency; obtaining effective ownership and control of the majority if not all U.S. real estate vests in the Conspirators control over everything. . 4, The “End Game” of the judges and their co-conspirators represents a clear and present danger and a very real existential threat to our U.S. Democracy. 5. “The Judges” and their co-conspirators, accomplices, surrogates and proxies by their acts of commission and acts of omission, have committed “misconduct” defined as “conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts, including a substantial and widespread lowering of the public confidence in the courts among reasonable people and bring the judicial branch of the U.S. Government into disrepute. 6. The Judges and their co-conspirators have violated: a. each respective judges’ code of judicial ethics to which they swore when they accepted the appointment as a federal judge or a state court judge; and ; iii. b. each respective judge’s sworn oath of allegiance to the United States of America and to uphold and defend the U. S. Constitution. 7. “Harm, Injuries and Damages” suffered by Petitioner/Freitas in