No. 22-7580
Victor Alfredo Bermudez v. United States
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing notice-of-objection preservation-of-error preservation-of-objection procedural-error sentencing standard-of-review supervisory-powers trial-court-notice
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a specific objection must be lodged to preserve a procedural error claim when the trial court was put on notice of the objection through defendant's argument
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether a specific objection must be lodged to preserve a procedural error claim when the trial court was put on notice of the objection through defendant’s argument. STATEMENT REGARDING PARTIES TO THE CASE The names of all parties to the case are contained in the caption of the case. Bermudez Petition for Writ of Certiorari Page ii
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-07-31
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2023-06-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 31, 2023.
2023-06-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 29, 2023 to July 31, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-05-30
Response Requested. (Due June 29, 2023)
2023-05-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/8/2023.
2023-05-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-05-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 16, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Victor Bermudez
James Patrick Whalen — Whalen Law Office, Petitioner
James Patrick Whalen — Whalen Law Office, Petitioner