Whether the New Hampshire Supreme Court violated the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution by denying the petitioner's appeal to continue their appeal for further proceedings

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Z DVD NH Supreme Cot violate the HI Amedmant the Us Conch tution by he fusio y te allow me to tonhaue my appeal to fornae prupers, when it hod apprreatty tecepted T Wad fs oh genf2 Z Was it tn shoe of deretion er the cut ty enertially endeap me Af makin s a feenniceh Violation (uhien Lara prefertucl ex cit te hMéraves a cope they ebursusly didnt uscni +e heor) by relying on their peed graces for Bn VAlifo mhz” extenci oa of ims So thet TP cours obtain © copy of the. Aecol galiaf pales, thereby averding ony Ptexteel dismascls Gathe parts f a tech nce riolatren? (Migs xD even hove « protect Re boaty idberscd wi thee olth Sesignehiep f my Appeal ao nen detory” 2? ) 42) more Aeerty: was it ohuse of ditecetionfe the NH Supreme G te dismiss my COS by refusing +s gqrend on -elencion f hme, tshen Aley 9 cant Wf to cther oppelacts Oa Oo moctt af Comane ?